A former client of Steve ‘Commando’ Willis has come forward with serious allegations, claiming she was unfairly slapped with an apprehended violence order (AVO) for stalking after the celebrity personal trainer allegedly lied under oath about their communication. Jun “Margaret” Yue was ordered to stay away from Mr. Willis in October of last year after he claimed that he feared for his safety due to her escalating behaviour. However, Yue now disputes his version of events, accusing Willis of falsely portraying their interactions.
Yue, who had worked with Willis during his time on The Biggest Loser, is adamant that she did not engage in any stalking behaviour and that their communication was not as sinister as Mr. Willis made it seem. According to Yue, the pair exchanged messages as part of a professional relationship that, over time, became more strained. However, she insists that her attempts to reach out to him were never threatening or harmful.
The AVO, which was granted against Yue in October 2024, has been a source of emotional and legal turmoil for her. She alleges that the order, which requires her to maintain distance from Willis, was the result of misrepresented information. Yue claims that Willis’s testimony about their messages was inaccurate and misleading, and she argues that the legal outcome does not reflect the true nature of their interactions.
Willis, on the other hand, maintains that he was concerned about Yue’s behaviour and that he felt threatened by her actions. His claims of escalating behaviour were central to the granting of the AVO, and he has stated that he acted in accordance with his own safety concerns. However, Yue’s side of the story suggests that there may have been misunderstandings or exaggerations on Willis’s part.
The case has brought attention to the potential dangers of legal orders based on personal relationships and the power of celebrity influence in shaping public perceptions. As the matter unfolds, questions about the accuracy of testimonies and the fairness of the legal process in cases involving high-profile individuals remain at the forefront of the dispute.
Yue is now seeking to clear her name, challenging the validity of the AVO and seeking a reversal of the order, which she believes was unjustly imposed due to what she claims were lies told under oath. The outcome of this case could have broader implications for how courts handle allegations involving public figures and the legal protection of individuals accused of stalking.
